Search for: "Shields v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm
The SHIELD Act will use the same definition of “private information” as New York’s data breach notification law, which includes online account credentials, as well as an individual’s name along with a Social Security number, driver’s license number, payment card information, or biometric information. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Washington v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
District Court Properly Granted Summary Judgment in Class Action Alleging Coca-Cola Violated ERISA by Interpreting Plan so as to Permit an Offset Based on Receipt of Social Security Benefits and to Recoup Overpayment of Benefits Eleventh Circuit Holds Plaintiffs, participants in long term disability plan, filed a class action against their employer, Coca-Cola, in its capacity as sponsor and administrator of a benefits plan alleging violations of the Employee… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
Four Thoughts on the Briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:30 am
Definition of Private Information under New York’s SHIELD Act The SHIELD Act defines private information as a: (1) social security number;(2) driver’s license number or non-driver identification card number(3) account number, credit or debit card number in combination with any required security code; (4) account number, credit card number or debit card number which may be used to access financial information without an additional… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
Moreover, since they are considered lawfully present, DACA recipients will be eligible for Social Security benefits, including a Social Security number itself when they apply for employment authorization, which assists individuals in filing taxes, obtaining identification cards, and obtaining employment. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm
The Social Security Administration concurred, and awarded LaVertu disability benefits under the Social Security Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
”* The Appellate Division noted that the CBAs provided that when certain retirees "reache[d] his or her sixty-fifth (65th) birthday and qualifie[d] for medical insurance under Social Security, the coverage shall be changed to that which is supplemental to Medicare. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Thus, businesses should promptly implement security measures targeted to address specific shortcomings posed by increased use of remote work technology and social media. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will use existing authorities to impose security and privacy requirements on consumer goods – hopefully in the form of standards but possibly in the form of mandates. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
Furthermore, the EU-US privacy safe harbor and Privacy Shield both failed because the EU believes that EU consumer data isn’t secure from US government snooping. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
The rule is part of the Biden administration’s effort to address the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
The Social Security Administration has indicated that payment of taxes, administration costs of the trust, and attorney’s fees do not violate the sole benefit rule. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:55 am
New Jersey (Feb. 27) – Dispute between states over New Jersey’s efforts to withdraw from a 1953 agreement involving seaport security. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-4096 November 10, 2011 Judge: Ebel Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Richardson appealed a district court's order that affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Childhood Disability Benefits. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
[A Social Security screw-up, prolonged detentions, and greasing the wheels of justice.] [read post]
